<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Waveformation &#187; VOIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waveformation.com/category/technology/voip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waveformation.com</link>
	<description>Jamie Schwinn's Technology Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:45:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>July 2010 Update for CoMo</title>
		<link>http://waveformation.com/2010/07/19/july-2010-update-for-como/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://waveformation.com/2010/07/19/july-2010-update-for-como/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Schwinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waveformation.com/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft just released a compelling update for it&#8217;s Communicator Mobile client. See the KB article for a full list of improvements. The update brings the current CoMo version to 6906.29. Download the Smartphone package. Download the Pocket PC package. Issues that this hotfix package fixes Provides home screen support for new home screens in Windows [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://waveformation.com/2010/07/19/july-2010-update-for-como/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can&#8217;t Call Exchange UM Auto Attendant from OCS</title>
		<link>http://waveformation.com/2010/06/17/cant-call-exchange-um-auto-attendant-from-ocs/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://waveformation.com/2010/06/17/cant-call-exchange-um-auto-attendant-from-ocs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Schwinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waveformation.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran into an issue trying to call a new Exchange UM Auto Attendant from OCS today. Calls to the AA&#8217;s DID kept failing and the only error in the OCS Log (Snooper) was &#8220;The application specified an invalid request-uri&#8221;. The issue ended up being a problem with the name of the Exchange UM Auto [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://waveformation.com/2010/06/17/cant-call-exchange-um-auto-attendant-from-ocs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great Article on OCS E.164 aka RFC 3966</title>
		<link>http://waveformation.com/2009/06/25/great-article-on-ocs-e164-aka-rfc-3966/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://waveformation.com/2009/06/25/great-article-on-ocs-e164-aka-rfc-3966/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Schwinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E.164]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[normalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFC 3966]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waveformation.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Normalization and dial plans was one of those topics that took me a awhile to fully understand. I think this is true for many people who are being introduced to the telephony world for the first time by attempting to implement Enterprise Voice with OCS. This article does a good job of explaining the how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://waveformation.com/2009/06/25/great-article-on-ocs-e164-aka-rfc-3966/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grandstream GXP-2000 Label Template</title>
		<link>http://waveformation.com/2007/07/17/grandstream-gxp-2000-label-template/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://waveformation.com/2007/07/17/grandstream-gxp-2000-label-template/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Schwinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jschwinn.com/2007/07/17/grandstream-gxp-2000-label-template/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw post on trixbox.org where someone had shared a PDF version of their GXP 2000 label template. http://www.trixbox.org/forums/vendor-specific-unmoderated/grandstream/label-template-gxp-2000-feature-buttons So I decided to share my Excel version which I like better since the PDF version wouldn&#8217;t allow you to enter data on multiple lines per extension. Grandstream GXP-2000 MS Excel Label Template]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://waveformation.com/2007/07/17/grandstream-gxp-2000-label-template/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
